Energion Home Page About Energion Mission Statement of Energion Religion and Philosophy Science Papers and Essays Book Reviews, All Topics Chatting and Messages Directories and Links Shop Energion! Energion Site Map Energion Home Page
Custom Search

Frequent Objections to Theistic Evolution

Charles Darwin, who first defined the theory of evolution


Over the years since I first accepted the theory of evolution, I have been asked many questions about my belief and its compatibility with Christianity. A few of these questions are new and challenging, but many of them are either repetitive, or very similar to questions I have answered previously. Of course, I mean that they are repetitive to me, not to those who ask them.

This FAQ, or response to frequent objections, is designed to provide the person who is honestly examining the various viewpoints with answers to major objections that are commonly provided. I will deal here with the relationship of theistic evolution to views such as old earth creationism, young earth creationism, and intelligent design.

I hope these answers are helpful. Remember as you read them that each is a short answer to the question. Details will be dealt with under individual questions. I also provide links to previous articles and blog entries that I have written, as well as to other sources following each question.

This FAQ is specifically about theistic evolution. While I will provide definitions and basic information about evolutionary theory in order to talk about it, I'm writing specifically about the interaction of theology and evolutionary theory. I will provide links to other sources of good information about evolution on the web.

For general information on creation and evolution, see my Creationism vs Evolutionism directory.



Directory

Objections and Answers

    

Objection #1: Theistic evolution cannot be true because it ignores the way the Bible says God created the earth.

This objection is generally stated incorrectly, implying that theistic evolutionists simply ignore the Genesis story of creation. To be more precise, theistic evolution does not deny Genesis. Rather, it denies a specific interpretation of Genesis.

Let me be clear that the response "that's just your interpretation" is not an adequate response to this objection. Rather, I mean that the issue is not whether one person or another cares what the Bible has to say, but what each person thinks the Bible means.

See the links below for a discussion of interpretation and how it applies to evolution and origins.

The amount of scientific information you can get from Genesis depends on the type of literature it is.

Related Links:

    

Objection #2: How can you accept the theory of evolution and also believe in God? Isn't the theory of evolution essentially atheistic?
There is simply no conflict between acceptance of the theory of evolution and belief in God.

The theory of evolution is simply a scientific theory explaining how life on earth has diversified. It does not comment on whether or not God exists. Certain advocates of this theory in popular literature connect it with atheism, oddly enough from both the atheistic and fundamentalist Christian sides of the debate, claim that theism and evoluiontary theory are incompatible. It is, in fact, incompatible with certain subsets of Christian belief, such as a reading of Genesis as narrative history, but there are many forms of theism, including Christian theism, that are compatible.

Related Links:

    

Objection #3: What is young earth creationism?

Young earth creationism is the belief that the universe was created in six literal days (with the seventh set aside for rest) 6,000 (or so) years ago. (Some adherents to the young earth position will allow up to 10,000 years.) In general, YECs also accept a literal, worldwide flood based on Genesis 6-9.

Though many claim a scientific basis for this belief, in fact it is primarily the result of a particular style of Biblical interpretation. In particular, adherents take the first 11 chapters of Genesis both literally and as narrative history.

Opponents tend to depart from either the literal meaning or the genre of the literature claimed by YECs.

Young earth creationism is the belief that God created the universe in six literal days about 6,000 years ago.

Related Links:

    

Objection #4: What is old earth creationism?
Old earth creationism holds that the earth was specially created, but is about 4.5 billion years old.

Old earth creationists accept the scientifically determined age of the earth and of the universe, but believe that God created over periods of time. They hold that even though the creation happened over periods of time, God nonetheless specially created invidual "types" of creature.

Often old earth creationists will also hold that the flood was a localized event, more of a civilization destroying flood than one that spanned the entire globe.

Related Links:

    

Objection #5: What is the gap theory? What is ruin and restoration creationism?

Unlike young earth creationism, the ruin and restoration theory holds that the earth and the universe are old, but unlike the old earth creationists they believe that the Genesis creation did occur in 6 literal days. They believe that previous creations have existed, and were destroyed by God's judgment before the Genesis 1 creation.

They believe that Genesis 1:1 describes that earlier creation, then Genesis 1:2 should be translated "the earth became formless and empty" while the movment of the Spirit of God in Genesis 1:2 is the beginning of this new creation.

The gap theory and ruin and restoration creationism both refer to the theory that the earch has been destroyed one or more times before Genesis 1.

Related Links:

    

Objection #6: How can we identify the intelligent designer in ID arguments?
Intelligent design makes no sense unless the intelligent designer is supernatural.

The intelligent design movement says that the intelligent designer need not be God. This is one element of their argument that ID is not religious in nature. Nonetheless, while any particular case of intelligent design might be explained by a variety of intelligent agents, ultimately, much like the "uncaused cause" we must come to a designer who is not part of the natural world, otherwise nothing has been explained.

Related Links:

    

Objection #7: What elements do you believe should be part of a Biblical doctrine of creation?

The Bible discusses creation in a number of contexts, and from these we can get some essentials of a Biblical doctrine. I believe that the key is the belief that God is the ultimate creator. There are several other elements:

  • God is the creator of everything (Genesis 1:1-2:4a, Psalm 104:24, Hebrews 1:2, Romans 11:33-36)
  • God creates by simple command so His word is certain (Psalm 33:6-9)
  • God put personal care into creation (Genesis 2:4b-25)
  • Human beings were created in God’s image (Genesis 1:27), they were good (Genesis 1:31), and later they fell from that state (Genesis 3)
  • God created wisely (Psalm 104:24, Proverbs 8:22-31)
  • God continuously cares for His creation (Psalm 104, Acts 17:26-29)
The most essential element is that God is the ultimate creator.

Related Links:

    

Objection #8: Could you recommend some books I can read on [fill in particular view of creation here]?
I look for books that present their case positively and have the highest likelihood of drawing respect from experts.

I do recommend certain books on each of the major views. You should be aware as you read any of my lists that I have my own position, and may not select the same books as an advocate of each position would.

See the first link for my short list.

Related Links:


Participatory Bible Study Blog

Threads from Henry's Web

Most Current Post

Bill Arnold on the Composition of Genesis (Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:53:05 +0000)

I have written quite a bit about this topic on this blog, and am also doing a series related to it on my Threads blog, so I was glad to see another summary article (HT:  Dr. Platypus).  Most lay people are not well acquainted with critical theories about the Pentateuch, as they get the briefest [...]

Previous Posts

Most Current Post

The Need for my Series on Interpreting the Bible (Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 02:28:10 +0000)

… amongst many other things. As I’m preparing to move forward in this series, which covers only one small area, I find this post from the generally enlightening Jason Rosenhouse, who lauds simplistic arguments in putting down other simplistic arguments. He approvingly quotes Coyne: Unfortunately, some theologians with a deistic bent seem to think that they speak for [...]

Previous Posts

Blogs

Threads from Henry's Web
Thoughts on Religion in the world
Participatory Bible Study Blog
How-to articles and Bible studies
Pacesetters Bible School Newsletter
Pacesetters Bible School news and articles
The Jevlir Caravansary
Fiction book reviews, poetry, short stories
Energion Home Page Energion Home Page Email Henry Neufeld Email Webmaster Shop Amazon and support Energion BiblePacesetters Henry's other interests, business and personal pages
Henry's Web

Search the Energion.com store.
Product category:
Keywords:

Plaid Power

I support
Unity in Diversity

Link to Compuserve Religion Forum